Ever since the ChatGPT API opened up, all sorts of apps have been strapping on AI functionality. I’ve personally noticed this a lot in email clients: Apps like Spark and Canary are prominently bragging about their built-in AI functionality.
The most common features will write replies for you, or even generate an entire email using only a prompt. Some will summarize a long email in your inbox or even a thread. It’s a great idea in the abstract, but I think integrations like these conspire to make communication less efficient instead of more efficient. You should feel free to try such features—they’re fun!—but don’t expect them to change your life. Here’s why.
We are all overwhelmed with email and communication in general. It’s easy to look at this as a tech problem because it’s happening on screens. It’s not a tech problem, though—at least, it’s not only a tech problem. It’s a social problem.
You could say that you get too many emails, and that might be accurate. Another way of saying the same thing is that more people are trying to contact you than you feel mentally capable of responding to. Trying to solve a social problem with tech often only creates new social problems.
For example, instead of writing an email myself inviting you to come over and have some beers, suppose I asked ChatGPT to write that email. The result is 220 words long, including an introduction (“I hope this email finds you well!”), an explanation of the reasons people might want to have beers together (“It’s the perfect opportunity to catch up, share stories, and simply have a good time”), and a few oddly-worded details made up out of thin air (“I’ll make sure to create a comfortable and welcoming atmosphere, complete with some snacks to complement our beer tasting experience.”)
Most people, seeing an email this long, are going to feel too overwhelmed to read it. Maybe they’ll use AI on their end to summarize the message. I asked ChatGPT to summarize the long email into a single sentence, and it essentially gave me back my initial prompt: “Would you like to come over for beers?”
I don’t understand why this feature exists, but I love it. Most AI, to me, is in this category right now: an amusing curiosity. I love asking ChatGPT to write fake episodes of Star Trek, and I use it for things like that far more than anything to do with my job.
That isn’t to say the technology isn’t useful right now. There are actual uses for AI, and tools like ChatGPT can improve your writing. I just think that, overall, we don’t really know what this technology will be most useful for just yet.
Figuring that out isn’t just about technology, though; there are social issues to untangle. Written communication is a superpower. I, right now, am moving my fingers to strike plastic key caps in such a way that the ideas I have eventually wind up in your brain. There’s a lot of technology that makes this possible, yes, but the reason it all exists is so humans can share ideas. AI, like any other tool, is only useful if humans find productive uses for it, and that requires thinking carefully about what the tool is for. I could be wrong (I’m wrong a lot), but I’m not sure we know that yet.
This article was originally published on WIRED. double-think is a platform committed to broadening access to high-quality journalism, and we encourage you to engage with the original piece on the WIRED website. Our goal is to spotlight top-tier news and features from global leaders in reporting. We do not claim any ownership or authorship of the original work. If you enjoyed this piece, please consider supporting WIRED directly by subscribing or visiting their website. Thank you for reading.